代某光通信部品與次系統台商徵高階品管主管

代某光通信部品與次系統台商徵高階品管主管

本刊版主剛從中國回來 一周來未更新

代某光通信部品與次系統台商徵高階品管主管
請將履歷等資訊寄
hcsimonl@gmail.com


鍾 漢清
Hanching Chung (or HC/ hc)
網址：http://www.deming.com.tw
台灣戴明圈: A Taiwanese Deming Circle
http://demingcircle.blogspot.com/
地址：台北市新生南路三段88號2樓
電話：（02） 23650127

HBS Centennial Colloquia Reports

HBS Centennial Colloquia Reports

The Intellectual History of Harvard Business School

Published:	May 7, 2008
Author:	Richard S. Tedlow

Executive Summary:

This colloquium held at HBS in April looked at key developments in the areas of entrepreneurship, organizational behavior, accounting, and strategy, among others. HBS professor Richard S. Tedlow describes the highlights.

About Faculty in this Article:

Richard S. Tedlow is the MBA Class of 1949 Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at Harvard Business School.

• More Working Knowledge from Richard S. Tedlow
• Richard S. Tedlow - Faculty Research Page

Date: April 17-18, 2008
Faculty Chair: Richard S. Tedlow

Faculty Summary Report:

Colloquium: The Intellectual History of the Harvard Business School: Six Case Studies

What were the overall goals of the colloquium?

The colloquium had three goals. The first was to explore how seminal ideas have been created, developed, and refined at HBS during the past century. The second was to illustrate the variety of ways in which those ideas have influenced students, the business world, and the academy. And the third was to encourage future innovation by showing the mechanisms through which these high-impact ideas have been developed.

What were a few key developments in the history of Harvard Business School in the areas of entrepreneurship, organizational behavior, accounting and management, values and ethics, and strategy?

For the sake of space, let me select one area of inquiry, and that is Leadership and Organizational Behavior. The key developments include the original teaching of scientific management by Frederick W. Taylor; the change in perspective from Taylorism to the Human Relations approach, which resulted from the Hawthorne studies; and the later development of "contingency theory" as advanced in the classic by Paul Lawrence and Jay Lorsch, Organization and Environment. This extraordinarily rich heritage has exercised an impact around the world and continues to inform the teaching of Leadership and Organizational Behavior here at the Harvard Business School and elsewhere.

The Leadership and Organizational Behavior course in the First Year of the MBA program has a number of daunting assignments. First, it has to overcome the skepticism that some people have about whether leadership can in fact be taught. Then it must locate the organization to be led in the environment in which it exists and develop materials which generate discussion about a variety of issues which, though of critical importance, are often not susceptible to proof. The Leadership and Organizational Behavior course succeeds because, among other reasons, the richness of the field's history informs the faculty, which in turn develop materials which allow for an in-depth exploration of organizational dynamics.

The “starbursts” session provided brief yet in-depth looks at five unique figures in HBS history: John Lintner, Howard Raiffa, Georges Doriot, Theodore Levitt, and C. Roland Christensen. Is it possible to capture in a few words how these five very different people contributed to the life of HBS and to describe their impact outside the School?

Although these people are very different, there are nevertheless important lessons to be learned from them. Each of the five had a signature insight which established his reputation permanently. To be brief:

• John Lintner—the capital asset pricing model.
• Howard Raiffa—Bayesian decision theory.
• Georges Doriot—venture capital.
• Theodore Levitt—marketing myopia.
• C. Roland Christensen—the art of case-method teaching.

What is remarkable is that five such extraordinarily different personalities could flourish at our institution. Their backgrounds, both intellectual and personal, were highly diverse. Christensen, for example, was perhaps the School's foremost apostle of the case method. Doriot, in complete contrast, was the only professor at the School who didn't teach by the case method.

There are two characteristics which unite these five people. One is a profound devotion to the School and to its students. Two is that they all aimed high. The goals of all five of these people were very ambitious. The combination of their particular genius and the institution of which they were a part permitted their ambitions to be realized.

What insights or surprises did you walk away with?

I found it remarkable that so many of the most important figures in HBS history, and indeed so many of the people who were making presentations about them (and are very important at the School today) had to make a leap to become a part of this community. They had to leave their comfort zones. They had to abandon the normal methods of career advancement in the fields in which they were trained.

Without this willingness to take a leap, the greats of the past would never have fulfilled their destinies. Nor would the presenters.

I was also deeply impressed by the difficulty of maintaining this special edge as the special edge as the School grows and as business becomes global. The School has always exerted a powerful magnetism for a certain set of remarkable people. There is nothing automatic about this particular magnetism.

Judging from the history of the School, the challenge of the future is to find new ways in a new era to remain a special institution.

Will there be publications or other output from this colloquium?

I am hoping to write a book based on the colloquium.

The colloquium was video- and audio-taped, and there is already an interest by some people who were unable to attend in seeing some of the sessions. Some of the sessions may be edited and used, for example, to help new faculty to orient themselves to the School.

HBS Centennial Colloquia Reports

There are 29 articles for this feature.

As part of the School's centennial celebration in 2008, business leaders and policy makers from around the world met at HBS in October to discuss a wide range of business topics. We will highlight summaries of these discussions each week. Full videos and transcripts are also available.

Transforming Giants

Published:	October 21, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

A new type of 21st century company is emerging that is transforming how business is conducted. These are values-driven companies that define a core set of values and rely on these values in making all strategic decisions.

HBS Past and Present

Published:	October 7, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Eight enduring themes have characterized Harvard Business School from its earliest years, and remain as integral as ever to the way the School thinks and operates.

Harvard and HBS: The Next 100 Years

Published:	September 30, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Harvard President Drew Gilpin Faust reflected on Harvard Business School's past 100 years and shared her vision of the future, while HBS Dean Jay Light discussed the School's history and highlighted key focus areas for the future.

Business Summit: Real Estate

Published:	July 28, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Experts discuss the global real estate crisis, the future of securitization, and predictions for the future of the U.S. real estate market.

Business Summit: Business Education in the 21st Century

Published:	July 24, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Business schools are innovating and experimenting to change the MBA experience, and to help business education regain its relevance and value. Along with a changing curricula, programs are attempting to make the learning experience more interactive, engaging, global, and experiential.

Business Summit: Managing Human Capital—Global Trends and Challenges

Published:	July 21, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Human capital needed for globalization is lacking. Progress is required in important areas such as elevating more women to leadership positions, according to panelists at the HBS Business Summit.

Business Summit: Ethics in Globalization

Published:	July 17, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

It is impossible to regulate against greed and ethical shortcomings. What can be done is to force greater transparency and accountability.

Business Summit: China in the Global Economy

Published:	July 14, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

While the global economic downturn will affect China's exports, the domestic economy is expected to remain strong, agreed panelists at the HBS Business Summit.

Business Summit: The Coming World Oil Crisis

Published:	July 10, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Without enormous changes the world faces an imminent oil crisis—and there are no silver bullet solutions. People must wake up to the sobering ramifications of peak oil, which may be the defining issue of this century.

Business Summit: Historical Roots of Globalization

Published:	July 7, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

In this breakout session, panelists shared insights, informed by history, of the convergence that globalization promotes.

Business Summit: The Role of Social Entrepreneurship in Transforming American Public Education

Published:	July 2, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Amid formidable barriers, a set of passionate social entrepreneurs are disrupting the status quo in education with innovative and effective approaches that are producing measurable results. The challenge now is to build support so these solutions can be applied elsewhere.

Business Summit: The Role of Business Leaders in Sustaining Market Capitalism

Published:	June 30, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Business leaders at the HBS Business Summit agreed on the threats to capitalism, but offered different opinions on the way forward.

Business Summit: Business and the Environment

Published:	June 26, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

If the causes for global climate change are not addressed, the consequences for the planet are likely to be disastrous. Governments, business, and consumers must act.

Business Summit: Global Environment-Transformed Organization

Published:	June 23, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

According to two panel sessions led by HBS professor Clayton M. Christensen, successful organizations must continually transform themselves in today's dynamic world.

Business Summit: The Evolution of Agribusiness

Published:	June 19, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Agribusiness has come to be seen not just as economically important, but as a critical part of society. The future for this massive industry will be both exciting and complex.

Business Summit: The Future of Market Capitalism

Published:	June 16, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Professor Michael E. Porter leads a discussion on the shortcomings of the capitalist system and ways the business community can better serve broader societal interests.

Business Summit: Lawrence Summers on Market Capitalism's Historic Opportunity

Published:	June 12, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Confronting today's economic challenges represents an historic opportunity to save capitalism from itself, and in doing so, to create more prosperity and improve the lives of more people, says Lawrence Summers.

Business Summit: Enterprise Risk Management

Published:	June 9, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Risk management is a key to sustained firm growth, says professor Robert S. Kaplan. Key ingredients to a successful risk management program include the proper culture, clear parameters, discipline, measurement, and accountability.

Business Summit: Niall Ferguson and the Certainty of Uncertainty

Published:	June 5, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

The economic crisis should not have been unexpected, says professor Niall Ferguson. Business leaders should consider history when developing their strategies, plans, and models, and should keep in mind that outlier events occur.

Business Summit: Introduction to the Future of Market Capitalism

Published:	May 29, 2009
Feature:	HBS Business Summit

Professor Joseph L. Bower discusses a two-year research project exploring the views of global business leaders and HBS faculty on what might threaten the world's economic progress.

Viewing 1-20 of 29 Articles View All

讀書會: 帶小狗的女士 (契訶夫小說新選新譯)

Virginia Woolf《论小说与小说家》

俄國人的觀點 介紹三位作家
契訶夫 (第 杜斯妥也夫斯機 托爾斯泰 他們的"靈魂"之重視
收入《普通讀者》《论小说与小说家》148-51

我讀1970年代的大英百科的"契訶夫"條
知道他的作品都有英譯
而且帶小狗的女士 是最著名的一篇
妙的是 許多中國選集多沒選它
文章最後說 契訶夫的小說聲望越來越高
巴金譯過 Gorky
Meaning #1: Russian writer of plays and novels and short stories; noted for his depiction of social outcasts
Synonyms: Maksim Gorky, Gorki, Maxim Gorki, Aleksey Maksimovich Peshkov, Aleksey Maximovich Peshkov
的回憶契訶夫 (另外在淡淡的幽默--契訶夫回憶/契訶夫文集 收錄)


所以先前講的Gogol 是錯誤

Nikolai Vasilievich Gogol 寫的契訶夫 (Gogol Russian: Николай Васильевич Гоголь, Nikoláy Vasíl’yevich Gógol’; Russian pronunciation: [nʲɪkɐˈlaj vɐˈsʲilʲjɪvʲɪtɕ ˈɡoɡəlʲ]; Ukrainian: Микола Васильович Гоголь, Mykóla Vasýl’ovych Hóhol’) (31 March [O.S. 19 March] 1809,^[2] – 4 March [O.S. 21 February] 1852) was a Ukrainian-born Russian novelist, humourist, and dramatist.^[2]

----

帶小狗的女士：契訶夫小說新選新譯

鍾老師您好，

櫻桃園文化部落格 http://vspress.pixnet.net/blog

慶祝契訶夫150歲 讀書會 (需報名)


譯者大駕光臨

書: 帶小狗的女士：契訶夫小說新選新譯

時間: 11月6日/2010年 10:30-12: 00
地點: 台北市新生南路3段88號2樓 tel. 02 23650127

《契訶夫傳》/淡淡的幽默--契訶夫回憶/契訶夫文集

******

2010年7月號 (309期)

如果故事中出現槍，就必須發射！ 2010獨家專輯 契訶夫誕生150週年紀念版 [總導覽] 契訶夫巨人文學生涯全景 [現場] 彩頁直擊契訶夫莫斯科故居 [小說] 所有小說家的老師──短篇小說徹底解析 [戲劇] 世界戲劇最高殿堂──劇作魅力完全解讀 [名作] 經典<帶小狗的女士>新譯精析 [迴響] 誰來穿越時空傳簡訊給契訶夫？ 七月推薦 [劉克襄] 當月作家：野地漫遊十五座星球 [林文義] 最新散文<歡愛> 特別連載 [平路] 最新長篇小說《東方之東》終於曝光 讓我們足足等待八年，一切總算值得...... 今天早上才讀完讀書會: 帶小狗的女士 (契訶夫小說新選新譯) 晚上讀1970年代的大英百科的"契訶夫"條 知道他的作品都有英譯 而且帶小狗的女士 是最著名的一篇 妙的是 許多中國選集多沒選它 文章最後說 契訶夫的小說聲望越來越高 巴金譯過 Gorky Meaning #1: Russian writer of plays and novels and short stories; noted for his depiction of social outcasts Synonyms: Maksim Gorky, Gorki, Maxim Gorki, Aleksey Maksimovich Peshkov, Aleksey Maximovich Peshkov 的回憶契訶夫 (另外在淡淡的幽默--契訶夫回憶/契訶夫文集 收錄) 所以先前講的Gogol 是錯誤...... ***** 大事代誌 Dear HC, 大事的古音就是[代誌]， 大讀代，大家都知道(士大夫，就是staff 的古音)， 事也就是誌(記事為誌)，有一個讀音是和誌一樣。 在台語溯源，普遍已經接受此事實。 Ken Su ***** A generalisation of th Virginia Woolf The Common Reader The Russian Point of View http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/w/woolf/virginia/w91c/chapter16.html is kind will, of course, even if it has some degree of truth when applied to the body of literature, be changed profoundly when a writer of genius sets to work on it. At once other questions arise. It is seen that an “attitude” is not simple; it is highly complex. Men reft of their coats and their manners, stunned by a railway accident, say hard things, harsh things, unpleasant things, difficult things, even if they say them with the abandonment and simplicity which catastrophe has bred in them. Our first impressions of Tchekov are not of simplicity but of bewilderment. What is the point of it, and why does he make a story out of this? we ask as we read story after story. A man falls in love with a married woman, and they part and meet, and in the end are left talking about their position and by what means they can be free from “this intolerable bondage”. “‘How? How?’ he asked, clutching his head. . . . And it seemed as though in a little while the solution would be found and then a new and splendid life would begin.” That is the end. A postman drives a student to the station and all the way the student tries to make the postman talk, but he remains silent. Suddenly the postman says unexpectedly, “It’s against the regulations to take any one with the post”. And he walks up and down the platform with a look of anger on his face. “With whom was he angry? Was it with people, with poverty, with the autumn nights?” Again, that story ends. But is it the end, we ask? We have rather the feeling that we have overrun our signals; or it is as if a tune had stopped short without the expected chords to close it. These stories are inconclusive, we say, and proceed to frame a criticism based upon the assumption that stories ought to conclude in a way that we recognise. In so doing, we raise the question of our own fitness as readers. Where the tune is familiar and the end emphatic — lovers united, villains discomfited, intrigues exposed — as it is in most Victorian fiction, we can scarcely go wrong, but where the tune is unfamiliar and the end a note of interrogation or merely the information that they went on talking, as it is in Tchekov, we need a very daring and alert sense of literature to make us hear the tune, and in particular those last notes which complete the harmony. Probably we have to read a great many stories before we feel, and the feeling is essential to our satisfaction, that we hold the parts together, and that Tchekov was not merely rambling disconnectedly, but struck now this note, now that with intention, in order to complete his meaning. We have to cast about in order to discover where the emphasis in these strange stories rightly comes. Tchekov’s own words give us a lead in the right direction. “. . . such a conversation as this between us”, he says, “would have been unthinkable for our parents. At night they did not talk, but slept sound; we, our generation, sleep badly, are restless, but talk a great deal, and are always trying to settle whether we are right or not.” Our literature of social satire and psychological finesse both sprang from that restless sleep, that incessant talking; but after all, there is an enormous difference between Tchekov and Henry James, between Tchekov and Bernard Shaw. Obviously — but where does it arise? Tchekov, too, is aware of the evils and injustices of the social state; the condition of the peasants appals him, but the reformer’s zeal is not his — that is not the signal for us to stop. The mind interests him enormously; he is a most subtle and delicate analyst of human relations. But again, no; the end is not there. Is it that he is primarily interested not in the soul’s relation with other souls, but with the soul’s relation to health — with the soul’s relation to goodness? These stories are always showing us some affectation, pose, insincerity. Some woman has got into a false relation; some man has been perverted by the inhumanity of his circumstances. The soul is ill; the soul is cured; the soul is not cured. Those are the emphatic points in his stories. Once the eye is used to these shades, half the “conclusions” of fiction fade into thin air; they show like transparences with a light behind them — gaudy, glaring, superficial. The general tidying up of the last chapter, the marriage, the death, the statement of values so sonorously trumpeted forth, so heavily underlined, become of the most rudimentary kind. Nothing is solved, we feel; nothing is rightly held together. On the other hand, the method which at first seemed so casual, inconclusive, and occupied with trifles, now appears the result of an exquisitely original and fastidious taste, choosing boldly, arranging infallibly, and controlled by an honesty for which we can find no match save among the Russians themselves. There may be no answer to these questions, but at the same time let us never manipulate the evidence so as to produce something fitting, decorous, agreeable to our vanity. This may not be the way to catch the ear of the public; after all, they are used to louder music, fiercer measures; but as the tune sounded so he has written it. In consequence, as we read these little stories about nothing at all, the horizon widens; the soul gains an astonishing sense of freedom. In reading Tchekov we find ourselves repeating the word “soul” again and again. It sprinkles his pages. Old drunkards use it freely; “. . . you are high up in the service, beyond all reach, but haven’t real soul, my dear boy . . . there’s no strength in it”. Indeed, it is the soul that is the chief character in Russian fiction. Delicate and subtle in Tchekov, subject to an infinite number of humours and distempers, it is of greater depth and volume in Dostoevsky; it is liable to violent diseases and raging fevers, but still the predominant concern. Perhaps that is why it needs so great an effort on the part of an English reader to read The Brothers Karamazov or The Possessed a second time. The “soul” is alien to him. It is even antipathetic. It has little sense of humour and no sense of comedy. It is formless. It has slight connection with the intellect. It is confused, diffuse, tumultuous, incapable, it seems, of submitting to the control of logic or the discipline of poetry. The novels of Dostoevsky are seething whirlpools, gyrating sandstorms, waterspouts which hiss and boil and suck us in. They are composed purely and wholly of the stuff of the soul. Against our wills we are drawn in, whirled round, blinded, suffocated, and at the same time filled with a giddy rapture. Out of Shakespeare there is no more exciting reading. We open the door and find ourselves in a room full of Russian generals, the tutors of Russian generals, their step-daughters and cousins, and crowds of miscellaneous people who are all talking at the tops of their voices about their most private affairs. But where are we? Surely it is the part of a novelist to inform us whether we are in an hotel, a flat, or hired lodging. Nobody thinks of explaining. We are souls, tortured, unhappy souls, whose only business it is to talk, to reveal, to confess, to draw up at whatever rending of flesh and nerve those crabbed sins which crawl on the sand at the bottom of us. But, as we listen, our confusion slowly settles. A rope is flung to us; we catch hold of a soliloquy; holding on by the skin of our teeth, we are rushed through the water; feverishly, wildly, we rush on and on, now submerged, now in a moment of vision understanding more than we have ever understood before, and receiving such revelations as we are wont to get only from the press of life at its fullest. As we fly we pick it all up — the names of the people, their relationships, that they are staying in an hotel at Roulettenburg, that Polina is involved in an intrigue with the Marquis de Grieux — but what unimportant matters these are compared with the soul! It is the soul that matters, its passion, its tumult, its astonishing medley of beauty and vileness. And if our voices suddenly rise into shrieks of laughter, or if we are shaken by the most violent sobbing, what more natural?— it hardly calls for remark. The pace at which we are living is so tremendous that sparks must rush off our wheels as we fly. Moreover, when the speed is thus increased and the elements of the soul are seen, not separately in scenes of humour or scenes of passion as our slower English minds conceive them, but streaked, involved, inextricably confused, a new panorama of the human mind is revealed. The old divisions melt into each other. Men are at the same time villains and saints; their acts are at once beautiful and despicable. We love and we hate at the same time. There is none of that precise division between good and bad to which we are used. Often those for whom we feel most affection are the greatest criminals, and the most abject sinners move us to the strongest admiration as well as love.